PARTIES DISPUTE MEANING OF "OCCURRED"

131_C129

PARTIES DISPUTE MEANING OF "OCCURRED"

Commercial Property

Breach of Contract

Vacancy

Unfair Settlement Practices

 

In 2004, KPE Firstplace Land, LLC (KPE), purchased property in Tyler, Texas that included a 90,000-square-foot building. On December 31, 2005, KPE discovered that thieves had stolen copper coils from the air-conditioning equipment on the roof of the building, damaging the equipment. KPE filed a report with the Tyler Police Department that day. KPE's insurance agent reported the loss to KPE's insurance company on February 13, 2006.

 

At the time KPE discovered the damage to the air-conditioning equipment, its building was insured under a policy issued by CMI Lloyds. The policy provided that there was no coverage for loss or damage caused by theft if the building had been vacant for more than 60 consecutive days before that loss or damage occurred. At the time KPE's loss was discovered, the building had been "vacant" as defined by the policy for more than 60 consecutive days. KPE's claim was denied on March 6, 2006. The parties attempted to settle the matter but were unable to do so. KPE eventually filed a lawsuit alleging breach of contract, unfair settlement practices, and failure to comply with the prompt payment statute. The trial court found in favor of KPE and Lloyds appealed.

 

The key issue on appeal was whether the loss "occurred" when the property had been vacant for more than 60 days. KPE argued that the date the loss "occurred" was the date the air conditioner became damaged. Lloyds argued that the date the loss "occurred" was the date the loss manifested itself or was discovered. The Court of Appeals of Texas concluded that damage "occurred" when the property actually became damaged. Applying this definition, the court found that Lloyds could not prove that the building was vacant for more than 60 days on the date the air-conditioning equipment was damaged. As a result, it determined that the trial court found properly in favor of KPE.

 

The lower court's judgment was affirmed.

 

Central Mutual Insurance Company vs. KPE Firstplace Land, LLC-No. 12-07-00314-CV-Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler-November 26, 2008-271 South Western Reporter 3d 454